Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Merel Hoedt vs Emily Seibold Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoedt vs Seibold analysis and find out who is favored!
Merel Hoedt vs Emily Seibold Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hoedt 1 - 0 Seibold
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoedt has won 41.11% of points on their second serve, while Seibold has won 44.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoedt, in recent form, has won 57.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Seibold has won 60.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.59% and 41.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoedt has saved 52.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seibold has saved 60.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoedt has won 60.29% of matches played (W/L 41/ 27), with Seibold winning 43.75% (W/L 14/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 105/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 35/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 19), where as Seibold has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 27.78% of matches (W/L 5/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoedt winning 1 times and Seibold being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hoedt winning 2 and Seibold winning 0. The last match between Hoedt and Seibold was at the W15 Esch/Alzette, 11-01-2024, Second, I.hard with Merel Hoedt getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoedt and Seibold have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hoedt winning 0 times and Seibold 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hoedt winning 0, and Seibold 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoedt has played against opponents with an average rank of 185.9 while Seibold has played against players with an average rank of 216.66.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoedt has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seibold has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoedt has converted 51.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seibold has converted 49.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
522
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
824
Rank
442
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
55% (162-133)
Career Total W/L
53% (147-129)
57% (16-12)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Merel Hoedt | Emily Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (36/49) | 58% (32/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (27/36) | 44% (14/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (5/13) | 48% (11/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (30/55) | 35% (17/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Merel Hoedt
Player
Emily Seibold
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Merel Hoedt | Emily Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (16/12) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (37/25) | 58% (26/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (311/261) | 55% (205/167) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.64 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 179 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:6 | 1:39:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.75 | 154.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1186/1799) | 62% (737/1184) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (730/1186) | 64% (471/737) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (252/613) | 45% (201/447) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (140/271) | 49% (88/179) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (943/1930) | 48% (612/1263) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (9/7) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 64% (9/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (16/28) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 85% (13/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 15% (13/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (8/0) |
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Merel Hoedt
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Angelina Wirges
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Anna Klasen
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sina Herrmann
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
18
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
52%
(
47 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tilde Stromquist
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Natalia Kowalczyk
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
28%
(
19 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Selina Dal
Player
Emily Seibold
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
49
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Emily Seibold
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Emily Seibold
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
79%
(
92 of
117)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
50 of
92)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isabelle Cherny
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Marie Mettraux
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Emily Seibold
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Emily Seibold
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Jazmin Ortenzi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Hoedt Vs Seibold Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
